Edwards seems like the conventional pick, but I really prefer the potential of Terry on the team because it feels like his game has a lot in common with Steph's, and that means a bunch of good things. Mentorship is one of the biggest ones: can you imagine how useful it would be to learn from him (& Klay!) on what it takes to be a winner at the NBA level? Plus, if he develops into a capable Steph backup, that really helps simplify schemes and lineups so the younger guys can play a lot of the same stuff the starters are running.
Haven't looked into Terry much because I assume the Warriors won't take a PG, but imo everyone should be under consideration. Draft the best player available, especially if it's considered a weak draft. If he can play but not with Curry they can package him for a player who fits the timeline better.
Of these two, I'd rather have Edwards. There's just a better potential fit. Edwards can play with Steph and/or Klay. Terry is basically a poor man's version of Steph including on defense. Would be tough to pair Steph and Terry on D for any extended stretch.
That said, I'm definitely no big fan of Edwards- there are potential trade packages where the Warriors move down for an additional pick or player and get Terry. Assuming the extra asset functions as a good fit, I think I'd prefer that. Like do the bridge trade with the Magic, absorb Aaron Gordon, get the 15th pick back and take Terry. I like that better than Edwards.
Terry is kind of a luxury pick, but it's a tasty one. The idea of a very similar profile player backing up Steph, and slowly soaking up minutes over the next four years is a very intriguing way to keep the system in place and extend the end stages of Steph's prime.
I watched at least a dozen games of Tyrell Terry this year. He hit a bit of a wall mid season but bounced back. He’s a basketball savant and would be a massive upgrade for the back up point position. In terms of basketball IQ he’d be a perfect fit for the team and I would absolutely love to see him in the Warriors program. I have zero doubt he will have a long and successful NBA career. I would have preferred he get one more year of college growth under his belt.
I'm not big on Edwards because I have the same concerns as the others, but Terry just seems way too small for what the dubs need and as an asset. Sure, he's shooting better than Edwards, but that can be completely erased in the nba due to longer, stronger, quicker defenders. Vote this round for Edwards.
This one is easy. Edwards. He has all the tools needed to develop into a very good-to-great player. He's young, but he has the potential to contribute now and gradually increase his role as he develops.
As someone who doesn't watch ANY college basketball, these are an ideal sort of summary articles I look for.
That said, I'm not really feeling Edwards as our pick. Not exceptionally long, or a great shooter? Seems like a risky use of a top draft pick - but what do I know?
Edwards, but I have to say the stats don't impress me for a guy that is supposed to have a chance at being the number 1 pick.
Edwards. Potential. Higher ceiling.
Anthony Edwards! I watched both but Anthony Edwards is a BEAST when it comes to the Glass & his numbers are HIGHER. Numbers don't lie.
Edwards seems like the conventional pick, but I really prefer the potential of Terry on the team because it feels like his game has a lot in common with Steph's, and that means a bunch of good things. Mentorship is one of the biggest ones: can you imagine how useful it would be to learn from him (& Klay!) on what it takes to be a winner at the NBA level? Plus, if he develops into a capable Steph backup, that really helps simplify schemes and lineups so the younger guys can play a lot of the same stuff the starters are running.
Haven't looked into Terry much because I assume the Warriors won't take a PG, but imo everyone should be under consideration. Draft the best player available, especially if it's considered a weak draft. If he can play but not with Curry they can package him for a player who fits the timeline better.
Of these two, I'd rather have Edwards. There's just a better potential fit. Edwards can play with Steph and/or Klay. Terry is basically a poor man's version of Steph including on defense. Would be tough to pair Steph and Terry on D for any extended stretch.
That said, I'm definitely no big fan of Edwards- there are potential trade packages where the Warriors move down for an additional pick or player and get Terry. Assuming the extra asset functions as a good fit, I think I'd prefer that. Like do the bridge trade with the Magic, absorb Aaron Gordon, get the 15th pick back and take Terry. I like that better than Edwards.
Terry is kind of a luxury pick, but it's a tasty one. The idea of a very similar profile player backing up Steph, and slowly soaking up minutes over the next four years is a very intriguing way to keep the system in place and extend the end stages of Steph's prime.
I watched at least a dozen games of Tyrell Terry this year. He hit a bit of a wall mid season but bounced back. He’s a basketball savant and would be a massive upgrade for the back up point position. In terms of basketball IQ he’d be a perfect fit for the team and I would absolutely love to see him in the Warriors program. I have zero doubt he will have a long and successful NBA career. I would have preferred he get one more year of college growth under his belt.
I'm not big on Edwards because I have the same concerns as the others, but Terry just seems way too small for what the dubs need and as an asset. Sure, he's shooting better than Edwards, but that can be completely erased in the nba due to longer, stronger, quicker defenders. Vote this round for Edwards.
This one is easy. Edwards. He has all the tools needed to develop into a very good-to-great player. He's young, but he has the potential to contribute now and gradually increase his role as he develops.
thanks for putting these together!
As someone who doesn't watch ANY college basketball, these are an ideal sort of summary articles I look for.
That said, I'm not really feeling Edwards as our pick. Not exceptionally long, or a great shooter? Seems like a risky use of a top draft pick - but what do I know?